Towards the end of last year, I spoke with a senior manager at my company. Struggling with a 150 mile round trip commute, I asked if she would consider a request to work some of the time from home. I had tried it temporarily before, and on one-off occasions, but it had never been granted to anyone in the department.

WFH - "working from home" nicked from the zazzle website
My manager was positive. Department morale was low, and she thought that offering this particular option would be a great option for those such as myself who could benefit. Recently having returned from the Amsterdam office, where the majority of technical staff worked from home, she warmed to the idea. She offered hope, took the idea to the next department management meeting, and promised to report back to me.
A few days later, she got a more junior manager to let me know that the answer was no. An important part of my role was to be visible and available, and that was to be the end of it. Any warmth in our personal working relationship had instantly thawed, to the point that she never spoke to me again, not even to be involved in my sudden removal from the company three months later. I have little doubt that whatever the justification was in my subsequent redundancy, and the way in which it happened, that I did myself no favours in my request to work from home.
So why, then, were they so reluctant, when it works so well for some people? For the last few weeks (and for the foreseeable future, at least in the short term), I have been working permanently from home. As someone struggling with mobility and unable to drive, it has been the perfect solution, and certainly the irony is not lost on me that the option that I pushed hard and unsuccessfully for is now working perfectly to my advantage.
Working from home won’t work for everyone. It’s not ideal for management staff, who need to be in the office to be available to their staff and for face-to-face communication. And clearly there will be professions where it can’t be a consideration. But for those, like myself, who can set up at home, go online and have a phone with them at all times, well, it’s just one big skive. Isn’t it?
The answer is no. Well, I would say that, wouldn’t I? I’m trying to advocate working from home, and I’m still writing as the biased angry man who wants to prove a point from a distance to his evil ex-employer. But let’s put my personal opinion and bias to one side, and look at the pros and cons.
In the office, everyone can see you. It’s true, they can see that your lunch hours are no longer than sixty minutes, and they can see whether you’ve snuck onto Facebook instead of working on the tasks you’re supposed to be working on. But nobody stops you if you’re collared by a colleague for fifteen minutes to talk about Aston Villa. And people will judge you based on whether you arrive early, stay late, or do neither. You get pulled into meetings which aren’t directly relevant to you, you get impromptu work discussions, and hours can soon rack up.
At home, of course you can hide. You can be in Sainsbury’s instead of at your computer. You can be picking up the kids from school, catapulting irate birds across a phone screen, sorting out tradesmen at the house, cheering for the latest British semi-final hope on TV, or in my case visiting doctors or physiotherapists. You can “skive” to your heart’s content and nobody need know. But when out of sight and out of mind, there is just one thing to deal with. Your deadline. It has to get hit – if your manager can’t see you, or you are working entirely for yourself, you have no excuse. Your client or manager won’t care about the kids, your dodgy leg, or Andy Murray. So long as there are no circumstances outside of your own control, you hit the deadline. You just do.
So last week, did I work 9-5:30 every day, with an hour for lunch? Of course not. I had five days’ work to do in the five days, and it all got done. But I was able to take long breaks to incorporate Wimbledon, finish early to go to an event at school, take in a physio appointment, and so long as my phone was with me, I was contactable. To counter it, there were days started before breakfast, days spent working into the evening, and lunch hours ranging from ten minutes to, er, a couple of hundred.
Working from home, when the alternative is driving 750 miles a week, saves money and saves carbon emissions. The average small car emits 400g of CO2 per mile. Fortunately I’m a mathematician so I don’t mind doing these things … that’s 14.1 tonnes a year over 47 weeks. If you’re not an environmentalist, why not? Nevertheless, it can be justified in price too – if the same small car does 37 mpg then that’s an annual saving of £5449 in petrol and a car that doesn’t run itself into the ground in three years. It’s a no-brainer.
It’s true that I am now working for myself rather than for a company, so perhaps the lack of guaranteed salary makes my motivation higher. But nevertheless, if you can work from home, and your productivity over the course of the week isn’t jeopardised, then you should do it. If your employer won’t allow it, I think that’s a real shame. Fortunately for me, I’m no longer working for the employer that wouldn’t allow it for me. And though my income is less certain as I freelance, I haven’t looked back and I haven’t been this happy in my work environment in a long time.